horchata-punk:

make me this plz
urbanhippiee:

▲▼▲▼▲▼gypsy/indie/boho/bambi▲▼▲▼▲▼
fizzyvater:

Clare Grill
artprostir:

Traditional religious tattoo of Tibetan monks
joshlpadilla:

Warhol. 
deafmuslimpunx:

from India, with love and respect for all girls and women

louderdecibelle:

koizumim:

really though

if breasts, butts and legs are so distracting to men, to the point they cant function

why arent they that distracting to lesbians

and at that point

why isnt the penis bulge and legs not distracting enough to gay men to warrant men being put under the same dress codes

(via damn--son)

lucky-inlovee:

calmkai:

waeter:

omfgamierika:

bonitabreezy:

thepurpleeyedone:

I just got slapped in the face by 1999.

Hundreds of grade school girls sticking these in the corners of their eyes

THEY WERE MEANT FOR THE CORNERS OF YOUR EYSES I DIDN’T EVEN KNOW THIS I ALWAYS STUCK THESE ON MY EARSA ND THEY ALWAYS FELL OFF AND I WOULD ALWAYS GET MAD

ohi always pretended they were belly button piercing a

i put them on my lobes and pretended i had my ears pierced

I PUT THESE EVERYWHERE
In the 101 top-grossing family films…from 1990 to 2004, of the over 4,000 characters in these films, 75% overall were male, 83% of characters in crowds were male, 83% of narrators were male, and 72% of speaking were male. When the American Psychological Association commented on this research, they said, ‘This gross under-representation of women or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum of girls and women in roles that are non-sexualised.’  —

Natasha Walter, Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism, pages 69-70, 2010. (via bitemebeautiful)

Bringing this back as people have started reblogging this again and EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW THIS.

(via bitemebeautiful)

(via didyoueatallthisacid)